May 29, 2026 | idea_world

Organized Qwen Code automation environment
- Aligned the original qwen-code .github workflow and .qwen configuration paths and applied them to the test/ci-verify branch
- The .qwen directory is ignored, so it was forcibly included with git add -f .qwen
- Verified GitHub Actions setup for Qwen PR review, issue triage, and follow‑up bot
- Adjusted the repository guard for QwenLM/qwen-code in the Qwen automation workflow to match the current repo
Documented RunPod self‑hosted Qwen API integration method
- Requires OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL, OPENAI_MODEL as GitHub Actions Secrets
- QWEN_CODE_BOT_TOKEN and CI_BOT_PAT are for GitHub PAT usage, not model API keys
CI cleanup
- Removed SDK Python checks and E2E Tests workflow that assumed the original Qwen Code structure
- The current project lacks packages/sdk-python, npm run build, npm run bundle, test:e2e structures, so keeping the original CI would cause failures
- Simplified Idea World CI to focus on npm ci + npm run lint for this repository
- After successful manual execution of the latest lint check and Qwen PR Review in PR #3, completed squash merge
Investigated web‑search MCP
- Checked web-search-mcp providing bing, brave, duckduckgo searches
- Reference: https://github.com/mrkrsl/web-search-mcp
- Plan to fork later and customize the result format and Qwen Code flow
Issues discovered while using Qwen 3.6 model
- Misinterpreted the need to sync the .github workflow as a simple copy of some .qwen files
- Confirmed that even simple directory sync tasks require prior verification of source/target diffs
- While web‑search capability improved, additional validation is needed for interpreting search results in the context of code work
After 2 PM, internet outage cut off the RunPod Qwen server, halting further automation verification
Development retrospective: docs/retrospectives/2026-05-29.md